Study types & roadmap

Systematic reviews today. Built for all of research.

Here's what's available now, and what's next.

Available now

Live · end to end

Systematic reviews & meta-analysis

The complete PRISMA 2020 pipeline, from protocol to report.

See the platform Beta & Pilot
Real screenshot: Compendium's full-text screening screen resolving a reviewer disagreement Real screenshot: Compendium's reference library, with reviewer Include/Exclude decisions next to each study

On the roadmap

Same gold-standard reporting guideline per design, same privacy-first, human-in-the-loop approach. None of these are available yet.

Clinical trialsRoadmap

Randomized and interventional study designs

Observational studiesRoadmap

Cohort, case-control and cross-sectional designs

Case reportsRoadmap

Structured reporting of individual clinical cases

Diagnostic accuracyRoadmap

Studies that evaluate tests and diagnostic tools

Study protocolsRoadmap

Planning and registering research before it starts

Prediction & AI modelsRoadmap

Development and validation of predictive models

Economic evaluationsRoadmap

Cost-effectiveness and health-economics studies

Qualitative researchRoadmap

Interview, focus-group and mixed-methods studies

Why focus first? Depth before breadth: reviews are where fragmentation and methodological error hurt most. No promised dates or order, just the same standard of care.

Which study type should we build next?

Tell us your field, it helps us prioritize.

Email us & help prioritize